Adenoidectomy

It's been a while since I've written because I had another deadline at work. I will continue to have these deadlines until maybe the end of July, so my posting may be sparse for a while.

Today I will write about:

• Lamotrigine
• CST
• Dr. Cohen
• Bronchitis
• Yasko
• Rebuked
• Adenoidectomy

When I write, I try to keep things in somewhat chronological order, but I also try to focus on only one topic at a time. Sometimes these goals conflict with each other because events in my life become very intertwined.

Lamotrigine


Back in March, JF's neurologist prescribed Lamictal because he had an abnormal EEG and he often stares off into space. We're assuming that the staring spells are sometimes mini-seizures, and sometimes just normal daydreaming. Then we switched to the generic form, Lamotrigine. We've been increasing the dosage, per the neurologist's instructions.

Then JF was on a 25-day course of antibiotics for his chronic sinus infection.

While JF's school year was still in session his teachers reported that he was increasingly spacey.

As I see it, there were two possible explanations for his increasing spaceyness:

• The antibiotics are causing or aggravating a yeast overgrowth problem, and the probiotics aren't helping, yet. (We started the probiotics long after we had started the antibiotics.)
• The Lamotrigine is making him more spacey, rather than less spacey. I've heard that this is possible. (The cure is worse than the disease!)

I have no idea how to figure out which theory is correct. So I typed up the relevant sequence of events and faxed it to the neurologist. I was hoping to talk it over with her. She left a message on our phone for us. She said to drop back to three Lamotrigine tablets in the morning and three in the evening. (We had worked our way up to four & four by this time.) She also said that she wanted to see JF in July, rather than October.

We obediently dropped back to three & three tablets per day, and scheduled an appointment for July 24th. But I'm annoyed that I didn't get to talk to her. If she had called me at work at that time of day, I would have been able to talk to her, but she chose to use our home phone number instead, and didn't bother to try a different number when no-one answered. I understand that doctors are very busy, but I'm still frustrated.

We continued the probiotics for a week after the antibiotics ended. Day by day, I could see JF becoming slightly more alert and more talkative. But was it because of the timing of antibiotics/probiotics, because of the decrease in Lamotrigine, or because of the other supplements we've been giving him? I have no idea.

CST

My sister (Sister1) has been telling me about CranioSacral (or Cranial Sacral) Therapy. At first, she was telling me that I should try it to see if it helps my scoliosis. Recently, she has been suggesting that we try it on JF for his autism. She sent me this link: http://www.upledger.com/clinic/autism.htm.

The theory behind CST sounds like pure quackery to me: The therapist uses gentle pressure, about the weight of a nickel, on the body. This pressure somehow moves the bones of the skull, which in turn moves the dura mater beneath it, releasing built-up tension. The theory is that the dura mater normally expands and shifts as the brain grows, but in some people, it gets stuck. This theory is used to explain why some autistic kids bang their heads, supposedly to counteract the internal pain of a restricted brain.

What frightened me about Upledger's article was this statement, "The therapy must be continued until the child has reached full growth, because once the dura mater has lost its accommodative ability, it must be physically stretched by a therapist." That raised a red flag in my mind. It implies that you must continue the therapy for years. Maybe it's true, but that makes it sound like a classic scam.

I politely told my sister that I'm very skeptical about this. I'm keeping an open mind about it, but there are so many other therapies that I want to try on JF first, that have more science behind them.

However, I have been hearing about this from different places. The Spring 2007 edition of "New Developments" (a newsletter published by Developmental Delay Resources) has an article about the lymphatic system and lymphatic drainage therapy. It sounded similar to (but much more plausible than) CST. They use gentle pressure to massage the lymphatic system. Sure enough, at the end of the article, there was a reference to the Upledger website.

I have two possible theories about CST:

• Maybe it works only because the people who try it believe in it. Belief can be very powerful. If parents believe that a particular therapy will work, they will raise their expectations, and the child meets those expectations.
• Maybe it really works, but not for the reasons that John Upledger described. Maybe it works because of lymphatic drainage, rather than because of movement of the dura mater. Or maybe it works for some other reason.

I'm keeping an open mind, but this is still at the end of the list of therapies I want to try.

Dr. Cohen

On Monday 6/25, I took JF to see Dr. Cohen for a second opinion about vision therapy. He did the same tests on JF that Dr. Appelbaum had done, in slightly different ways. For example, instead of moving a penlight around to test JF's ability to track it, he used a wand with a tiny cube on the end. The cube had a different picture on each face. He asked JF about each picture while he moved the wand around. I think Dr. Cohen's way of doing things is much better for a 4-year-old.

Also, I didn't get to see what JF's eyes were doing this time. But I guess it doesn't matter.

Dr. Cohen said that he saw no reason for JF to have vision therapy. My jaw dropped. I told him about Dr. Appelbaum showing me how JF's eyes were not tracking the light appropriately for his age. I asked, "What could explain the difference?" He offered two theories:

• JF might have an intermittent vision problem and maybe he just happened to be okay that day.
• The supplements that Dana Laake prescribed may have improved his vision.

There's apparently no way to know which it is for certain. I asked whether we should come back for another evaluation, and he said we can come back in a year.

And now, I've heard from multiple people that Dr. Appelbaum prescribes vision therapy for everyone.

Bronchitis

After JF's visit to Dr. Cohen, it was my husband's turn. He took JF to the pediatrician the same day because JF was still coughing. He had been coughing for several days. The pediatrician diagnosed it as bronchitis and prescribed more antibiotics, Azithromycin.

JF has been off of antibiotics for 16 days, and now he's back on them again!

This time, however, we started him on probiotics the same day. I think it is helping to keep the spaceyness at bay this time, but not the diarhea.

On a happy note, this doctor visit also revealed that JF has gained back three pounds. Maybe this means that adding more nuts and peanuts to JF's diet is helping to compensate for his lack of enthusiasm for rice bread. And maybe this will make it easier for my husband to accept putting JF on a GFCF diet.

Yasko

On Tuesday 6/26, I attended a meeting of a group of parents who are exploring biomedical treatments for autism. Most of the parents at this meeting are trying the Yasko protocol. It appeals to me because sounds like a much more scientific approach, but they said it starts with a $700 genetic test.

I told my husband about it the next morning. At one point I said, "This scientific approach makes Dana Laake's recommendations seem like just throwing supplements at him and seeing which ones work." He said, "That's what I've been telling you all along!"

So maybe he'll decide that the Yasko protocol is worth investigating. I think I should wait for him to bring it up again, rather than nag him to tell me what he thinks about it.

Also, one parent at the meeting championed CST.

Rebuked

When we took JF to see Dana Laake back in May, she gave us four test kits. By 5/24, I had sent all four to the labs with hair and urine samples. We were told it takes three weeks to get any test results returned.

On 6/14, Dana sent me an e-mail message saying that she has gone over test results and we can discuss them the next time we meet. I started saving up all of my questions for that meeting, instead of sending them to her as they came up. I called her office and asked whether the results for all four tests have come back. All of them except the opiate peptide test have come back. I asked them to call me when they get the fourth one.

On 6/19, I sent a message to Dana asking whether the fourth one has arrived yet. Dana said her office will call the lab. I continued to save up my questions.

On Thursday 6/29, I gave up and sent a long list of questions to Dana. (It was pretty long, but not as long as my blog posts.)

She responded, politely explaining that she doesn't have time to respond to all of my questions right now, but we can schedule a phone consultation for the week of July 9th.

I don't blame her for this, but I'm frustrated. (And I'm hurt, but maybe I'm being oversensitive.)

Adenoidectomy

On Thursday 6/29, my husband took JF to the ENT doctor for a follow-up. The ENT doctor said JF should have his adenoids removed.

JF has had surgery before, to have his inguinal hernia repaired. That surgery was unavoidable, because a hernia can quickly turn into a life-threatening situation.

I'm not so sure about an adenoidectomy. I have done a few minutes of research on it, but I've found nothing useful so far.

I guess my fear is that we'll remove JF's adenoids and then someone will tell us, "You should have tried such and such first!"